With the Kurdistan referendum fast approaching on 25th September, OGInsights reviews the latest developments in this run-up period. What is important to note is that the question being put to the Kurdistan people is sufficiently vague – the meaning of an “independent” Kurdish state is intentionally not set out. Independence can mean self-rule and independent governance with varying degrees of autonomy from Federal Iraq or complete separation from Baghdad at the extreme.
The referendum should be viewed as an opinion poll, something that reminds the world and reaffirms the Kurdish aspirations for independence. It is not something that will have any immediate impact on the administration of the Kurdistan region, trade between Kurdistan and its neighbours or money flows with Baghdad. It certainly is not a declaration of independence either.
The referendum is symbolic and timing is more opportunistic than reasoned. President Massoud Barzani is coming to the end of his term and holding a referendum as being the first step to eventual independence is his chance to leave a legacy. The turnout is expected to be high and a “yes” vote is deemed inevitable which will score popularity points for President Barzani. Barzani has ensured that the voting ballots, systems and infrastructure is largely in place for a referendum at the beginning of September although the actual date will be the 25th, signalling the seriousness of this referendum for Barzani.
Leaving a legacy seems to be an important driver for this referendum, with Barzani spending much political ammunition to secure it. Turkey was not notified of the date of the referendum lest they would undermine it, Iran will fear reignition of calls by its own Kurds for independence and both the US and Baghdad will be annoyed that the referendum includes the disputed areas after being told to explicitly exclude them.
However, Kurdistan’s neighbours have not reacted to date suggesting a level of tolerance recognising that the referendum could be a tiger with no claws. Any action by neighbours is likely to take place before the referendum as any action taken post the referendum results will likely have minimal meaningful impact on Kurdistan and in some cases could have reciprocal impact on the initiator. For example, whilst Turkey could close the oil export pipeline and halt investment in Kurdistan gas, Turkey does do a lot of other trade with Kurdistan. Similarly, any retaliation by the US could see the loss of Kurdish support for the war in Syria.
The referendum will be closely watched around the world, but the results are not expected to be a surprise.
Related posts:
The referendum should be viewed as an opinion poll, something that reminds the world and reaffirms the Kurdish aspirations for independence. It is not something that will have any immediate impact on the administration of the Kurdistan region, trade between Kurdistan and its neighbours or money flows with Baghdad. It certainly is not a declaration of independence either.
The referendum is symbolic and timing is more opportunistic than reasoned. President Massoud Barzani is coming to the end of his term and holding a referendum as being the first step to eventual independence is his chance to leave a legacy. The turnout is expected to be high and a “yes” vote is deemed inevitable which will score popularity points for President Barzani. Barzani has ensured that the voting ballots, systems and infrastructure is largely in place for a referendum at the beginning of September although the actual date will be the 25th, signalling the seriousness of this referendum for Barzani.
Leaving a legacy seems to be an important driver for this referendum, with Barzani spending much political ammunition to secure it. Turkey was not notified of the date of the referendum lest they would undermine it, Iran will fear reignition of calls by its own Kurds for independence and both the US and Baghdad will be annoyed that the referendum includes the disputed areas after being told to explicitly exclude them.
However, Kurdistan’s neighbours have not reacted to date suggesting a level of tolerance recognising that the referendum could be a tiger with no claws. Any action by neighbours is likely to take place before the referendum as any action taken post the referendum results will likely have minimal meaningful impact on Kurdistan and in some cases could have reciprocal impact on the initiator. For example, whilst Turkey could close the oil export pipeline and halt investment in Kurdistan gas, Turkey does do a lot of other trade with Kurdistan. Similarly, any retaliation by the US could see the loss of Kurdish support for the war in Syria.
The referendum will be closely watched around the world, but the results are not expected to be a surprise.
Related posts:
