Trump administration hampers US oil

Plains All American Pipeline company has been denied a request for an exemption from steel import tariffs. This will hit plans to build much needed takeaway capacity for the evacuation of oil from the Permian Basin. The capacity bottleneck has already manifested in large discounts for Midland-Permian crude which is trading at a discount of c.USD12/bbl to WTI.

Plains sought an exemption for high-grade steel from Greece for its 585mbopd Cactus II pipeline to the port of Corpus Christi. However the government purports that the steel is domestically produced in “sufficient and reasonably available” quantities in denying the request. Plains is now looking to challenge the decision.

Plains released a strong statement criticising the government following the decision: “Collecting a tariff on steel pipe orders for projects like this constitutes a tax on the construction of critical U.S. energy infrastructure…and is a significant unintended consequence of current trade policy and risks U.S. energy security and American jobs.”

Read More

The nonsense of releasing US Strategic Petroleum Reserves

Trump is on a mission to contain oil prices and has been sending strong tweets and messages blaming OPEC and supposed ally Saudi Arabia for the current levels of “high” oil prices. The Trump administration’s policies are in complete dissonance as tampering with the Iranian sanctions is a key cause of the tightening of global oil supply and strong noises around US energy independence is in complete opposition to Trump asking OPEC to pump more oil, which illustrates that the US is far from energy independence and still needing to call up OPEC in times of need.

Trump is now considering tapping the US strategic petroleum reserves (“SPR”) in an attempt to lower oil prices in the run up to the US midterm elections; logic being that this will translate into lower prices at the pump. However, his administration may be wrongly conflating the two with no guarantee that a release of SPR will lower gasoline prices.

A release of SPR crude will likely do little to alleviate pump prices. US refiners are already running at near full capacity and additional crude will have limited ability to be absorbed and converted to gasoline domestically. In fact, additional crude on the market will likely depress WTI and increase the profits of the refiners rather than the benefits trickling through to the pumps. Furthermore, the SPR holds light crude whereas the feed slate for US Gulf refiners is typically heavy crude from South America.

The SPR was established in 1975 following the Arab oil embargo in 1973. The US, together with 28 other countries, are required by the International Energy Agency to hold no less than 90 days of import cover measured against the previous year’s net imports. It is designed to meet domestic demand in the case of supply disruptions. In the US, the SPR is held across four sites on the Gulf Coast with a total of 660mmbbl of mostly light crude. They can be released with a 13-day window once the POTUS gives the decision.

Read More

Saudi and Russia dominate gossip columns in run up to June OPEC meeting

As we approach the June OPEC meeting, all eyes on Saudi Arabia and Russia for any clues on the direction they will go on 22nd June. With the sanctions on Iran and imminent collapse of Venezuela, Trump has asked the two power weights to step in to avoid oil prices going any higher. This in itself is ironic as the US has been trying to wean itself off imports and attain energy independence from OPEC, yet it is now openly asking Saudi Arabia to help.

In recent days, both Saudi Arabia and Russia have hinted at wanting to increase production by 300mbopd, although the details remain to be thrashed out- i.e. will it be these two countries shouldering the increase or will it be spread amongst the OPEC members. The path this will take and desire to increase production will be dictated by whether consensus can be reached next week.

On the one hand, keeping a lid of oil prices is important for OPEC to avoid a wave of US production coming onstream with producer hedging. On the other hand, a number of OPEC nations urgently require cash flow from higher oil prices to balance precarious budgets.

If consensus can be reached to increase production, the additional barrels can be met by Saudi Arabia and Russia making up the production but will likely be criticised by other OPEC members of using the opportunity to snatch market share. An alternative would be for the members’ quotas to be renegotiated although this will open up another can of worms. In the case of the latter, it is noted that not all members are in a position to raise production (e.g. Venezuela, Nigeria, Libya which are fraught with domestic difficulties). Finally, OPEC members have been in over compliance so there remains running room to utilise the existing quotas, although this will again be shouldered by Saudi Arabia and Russia.

In the medium and longer term, fundamentals point to a supply shortfall so gradually raising production now will keep prices under control although the path ahead will remain choppy.

Read More

Iranian sanctions supports Chinese cause for the Petro-Yuan

Iran is not short of heavyweight supporters following the decision to re-impose strong sanctions on the country by the US. Although Europe works to salvage what it can of the JCPOA, most likely going down the ex-US route, President Trump’s decision on 12 May will still likely cause a retrenchment of European investment into Iran given the far reaching implications for any company (US or not) with a connection to the country.

The Chinese and Indians see the sanctions as a massive opportunity to strengthen ties with Iran. Both countries had negotiated waivers under previous sanctions under a US diplomatic push. However, with trade tensions now in the mix, especially between the US and China, the latter could use this opportunity to secure additional oil supplies from Iran at improved pricing – an economic decision, but also to send a message to the US. Indian refiners have also agreed to double imports to 500,000 bopd under improved terms.

In April, China (re)launched its long awaited Petro-Yuan – Yuan priced oil futures. An experiment which China tried before and abysmally failed when retail punters had so much sway on volumes and caused such volatility in pricing, that the government had to step in and close it down. The story is different this time as the Petro-Yuan hopes to attract serious institutional traders. Iran should also be on board, having stated a desire to settle its trade in currencies outside of the US Dollar.

As a result, the sanctions may not have the full intended effect of fully taking Iranian crude off the market, especially if it can find willing buyers in the likes of India and China for its oil. The current oil price highs, hitting USD80/bbl on 17^th May, may be short lived as the markets have priced in foamy speculation and geopolitical risk, and not looked beyond alternative buyers for Iranian oil or the ability of the other OPEC members to step up and compensate for any lost Iranian barrels.

Iran currently exports c.2mmbopd. The members to the JCPOA, the P5 + 1, comprises China, France, UK, USA, Russia plus Germany

Read More

Total to pull out of Iranian mega gas project if sanction waivers not granted

Total has warned that it will pull out of the giant South Pars development offshore Iran if it is unable to secure sanction waivers. The imposition of sanctions would be crippling for Total as it would completely lock it out of any US related activity including the ability to access the capital markets.

Should Total pull out, partner CNPC will take over Total’s 50.1% stake and operatorship of the project under a previous agreement which was entered with the foresight that Iranian sanctions may be re-imposed.

Source: Al Jazeera

Full press release from Total:

Paris - On 4 July 2017, Total, together with the other partner Petrochina, executed the contract related to the South Pars 11 (SP11) project, in full compliance with UN resolutions and US, EU and French legislation applicable at the time. SP11 is a gas development project dedicated to the supply of domestic gas to the domestic Iranian market and for which Total has voluntarily implemented an IRGC-free policy (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) for all contractors participating in the project, thereby contributing to the international policy to restrain the field of influence of the IRGC. 

On 8 May 2018, President Donald Trump announced the United States’ decision to withdraw from the JCPOA and to reinstate the US sanctions that were in force before the JCPOA’s implementation, subject to certain wind down periods. 

As a consequence and as already explained before, Total will not be in a position to continue the SP11 project and will have to unwind all related operations before 4 November 2018 unless Total is granted a specific project waiver by the US authorities with the support of the French and European authorities. This project waiver should include protection of the Company from any secondary sanction as per US legislation.

Total has always been clear that it cannot afford to be exposed to any secondary sanction, which might include the loss of financing in dollars by US banks for its worldwide operations (US banks are involved in more than 90% of Total’s financing operations), the loss of its US shareholders (US shareholders represent more than 30% of Total’s shareholding) or the inability to continue its US operations (US assets represent more than 10 billion dollars of capital employed).

In these circumstances, Total will not take any further commitment related to the SP11 project and, in accordance with its contractual commitments vis à vis the Iranian authorities, is engaging with the French and US authorities to examine the possibility of a project waiver.

Total confirms that its actual spending to date with respect to the SP11 contract is less than 40 million euros in Group share. Furthermore, considering the various growth opportunities which have been captured by Total in recent months, Total confirms that a withdrawal from SP11 would not impact its production growth target of 5% CAGR between 2016 and 2022.

Original link: https://www.total.com/en/media/news/press-releases/us-withdrawal-jcpoa-totals-position-related-south-pars-11-project-iran

South Pars development scheme

Read More