After a tumultuous period of oil prices with investment decisions and M&A transactions put on hold, the outlook is beginning to stabilise in 2017. With more comfort on the near term trajectory of oil prices, the corporate mind-set is shifting from balance sheet management to strategic re-focussing and growth.
Nevertheless, buyer-seller price expectation gaps still remain and a way to bridge this gap is the use of oil price contingent payments in a transaction. The last time this mechanism was seen in a major market deal was Seplat’s acquisition of Chevron’s assets in Nigeria in 2015. Today, this novel structure was seen again in Chrysaor’s acquisition of Shell’s North Sea portfolio, with an additional twist.
In the Chrysaor acquisition, the terms were as follows - Chrysaor would make payments to Shell of up to USD600 million split over the 2018-2021 period:
However, Chrysaor also managed to secure downside protection on its acquisition should oil prices fall. The transaction allows for Shell to make a payment to Chrysaor of up to USD25 million a year (totaling USD100 million) between 2018-21 should Brent fall in the range of USD47.5–52.5/bbl. Full payout of the USD25 million is made in each year if Brent falls below USD47.5/bbl.
The above structure strikes a balance in providing Shell protection from selling the assets too cheaply in a rising oil price environment and Chrysaor overpaying should oil prices fall. Given the structure of the mechanism, it is clear that the contingent consideration is based on near term rather than long term oil price performance with the size of the payments reflecting the impact on near term production cash flows depending on the direction of the oil price. The long stop date of 2021 is relatively long for an M&A transaction, but suitable for a transaction of this nature where oil prices behavior is exhibited over a longer period of time. While longer periods in which contingent payments are active are normally more beneficial to the seller, the mirroring contingent payment from Shell to Chrysaor in this instance puts both the buyer and seller on equal footing.
Nevertheless, buyer-seller price expectation gaps still remain and a way to bridge this gap is the use of oil price contingent payments in a transaction. The last time this mechanism was seen in a major market deal was Seplat’s acquisition of Chevron’s assets in Nigeria in 2015. Today, this novel structure was seen again in Chrysaor’s acquisition of Shell’s North Sea portfolio, with an additional twist.
In the Chrysaor acquisition, the terms were as follows - Chrysaor would make payments to Shell of up to USD600 million split over the 2018-2021 period:
- First payment to be made if Brent rises above USD60/bbl in 2018 and 2019
- Second payment to be made if brent rises above USD70/bbl in 2020 and 2021
- Full payout of the USD600 million is made if Brent reaches USD95/bbl anytime in the 2018-2021 period
However, Chrysaor also managed to secure downside protection on its acquisition should oil prices fall. The transaction allows for Shell to make a payment to Chrysaor of up to USD25 million a year (totaling USD100 million) between 2018-21 should Brent fall in the range of USD47.5–52.5/bbl. Full payout of the USD25 million is made in each year if Brent falls below USD47.5/bbl.
The above structure strikes a balance in providing Shell protection from selling the assets too cheaply in a rising oil price environment and Chrysaor overpaying should oil prices fall. Given the structure of the mechanism, it is clear that the contingent consideration is based on near term rather than long term oil price performance with the size of the payments reflecting the impact on near term production cash flows depending on the direction of the oil price. The long stop date of 2021 is relatively long for an M&A transaction, but suitable for a transaction of this nature where oil prices behavior is exhibited over a longer period of time. While longer periods in which contingent payments are active are normally more beneficial to the seller, the mirroring contingent payment from Shell to Chrysaor in this instance puts both the buyer and seller on equal footing.
