Endeavour endangers Alba sale for Statoil and Mitsui

Statoil and Mitsui started marketing their stakes in the Alba heavy oil field in the North Sea at the end of 2017. The field is located in a complex reservoir and developed from a steel platform tied to a floating storage unit.

The field has been marketed by partner Endeavour before without success. Endeavour put its stake up for sale in 2015 but failed to attract sufficient interest.

Sources have revealed that interest in the current sales effort is also thin with potential buyers raising a number of concerns:

Non-operated stake Both Statoil (17%) and Mitsui (13.3%) hold non-operated stakes. The operator is Chevron with 23.4%. This limits the new owner’s ability to implement efficiencies, especially as neither on their own or combined have a controlling stake. Chevron is a decent operator, but being a “major” inevitably means inefficiencies and costs creeping in. This is why the likes of BP have passed assets onto more nimble E&Ps who they know can run assets more efficiently.

Limited upside The field has been producing since 1994 and approaching end of life. Production could continue into the late 2020s but at increasingly insignificant volumes. In 2016, Alba produced at 15.3mbopd which compares to a peak of 80-90mbopd in the early 2000s. In 2014, Chevron undertook a 4D seismic survey to identify infill targets – although infill drilling could continue, Chevron has not committed to a full drilling programme of the prospects. Furthermore, Chevron is divided on its view of the North Sea portfolio – it is a good collection of assets generating good cash flow for North America but at the same time focus is turning to the US onshore. With Chevron’s new CEO Mike Wirth coming onboard in February and his background in downstream, the desire to put capital into the North Sea remains in question.

Decommissioning With a large number of wells and a steel platform, decommissioning will be a complex and high cost exercise – no small endeavour for a buyer to take on. Costs are currently estimated at c.USD750 million in real terms and could go up with the blanket of decommissioning activity coming up in the North Sea.

Endeavour bankruptcy Endeavour is the largest partner at 25.7%. Its US parent company entered into financial restructuring and the UK business is under creditor protection. The UK subsidiary Endeavour Energy UK Limited holds the interest in the field and still has debts of close to USD1 billion. The UK business is in default and the lenders, primarily Credit Suisse, have so far have extended repayment deadlines. However, if the lenders pull the plug on the business in light of Alba continuing to be loss making (per latest financial statements), then the remaining partners in the field will be compelled to take on additional stakes in Alba pro rata. This is a risk to a potential new owner and would increase exposure to future capex and decommissioning.

From the buyer feedback, it is clear why Statoil and Mitsui want to exit the asset. For Statoil, the UK North Sea is becoming less of a focus apart from its remaining large developments. For Mitsui its UK strategy appears to be retreat. Whether a sale goes ahead or not remains to be seen.

UPDATE 24 March 2018: Bidders pull out of Alba sale by Statoil and Mitsui

Read More

VNG to evaluate options for its Norwegian E&P business

As widely expected, VNG's owner EnBW is looking for a partner or buyer for its E&P business VNG - full press release below.

As part of VNG Group’s strategic programme “VNG 2030+”, VNG – Verbundnetz Gas Aktiengesellschaft (VNG AG) will explore strategic options for its oil and gas exploration and production business in Norway and Denmark, VNG Norge AS (“VNG Norge”). As VNG AG sees long term value creation potential in the E&P-business, the main objectives are to maximise the value of VNG Norge and to support further growth to position the shareholding as a leading player on the Norwegian Continental Shelf together with a strategic partner.

VNG Norge is a full-cycle Norway-focused E&P company, with a solid growth portfolio underpinned by the operated flagship asset “Fenja”, one of the largest Norwegian discoveries in recent years (formerly “Pil”), which is proceeding according to plan, sanctioned by VNG AG and fully supported by all shareholders of VNG AG. Overall the company holds interests in 32 licenses in Norway, two in Denmark and participates in five producing fields and in three field developments at the end of 2017.

Source: https://www.vng.de/en/news/vng-ag-evaluate-options-maximise-value-its-norwegian-ep-business

Read More

Forties Pipeline System reopens in time for the New Year

On 11^th December, INEOS the owner of the Forties Pipeline System, had discovered a hairline crack in the pipeline at Red Moss near Netherley. The crack continued to grow upon monitoring and the entire system was subsequently shutdown. INEOS announced this morning that the repairs are "mechanically" complete with the system being restarted - export rates should resume to previous levels around the new year.

The system carries c.450mbbl/d of production from the North Sea to the Kinneil processing facility in Scotland. The 235 mile pipeline links more than 80 North Sea fields and delivers almost 40% of UK North Sea production. Upon its outage, Brent crude jumped to USD65/bbl signalling the importance of North Sea production to the global oil markets.

Read More

Breathing new life into Tyra

The Danish Underground Consortium ("DUC") has approved an investment of DKK21 billion (USD3.4 billion) for the full redevelopment of the Tyra field.

DUC members are Total/Mærsk (31.2 %), Shell (36.8 %), Chevron (12 %) and Nordsøfonden (20 %). The development will ensure continued production from Denmark's largest field for years to come and will also rejuvenate important Danish offshore infrastructure. About 80% of the investment will be for modification of existing and construction of new facilities, with the remainder for decommissioning and removal.

The Mærsk press release noted:
"Tyra is the centre of Denmark’s national energy infrastructure, processing 90% of the nation’s gas production.

Through new development projects and third party tie-ins, the redevelopment of Tyra can be a catalyst for extending the life of the Danish North Sea – not just for Maersk Oil and the DUC, but also for Denmark."

"The new infrastructure can enable operators to pursue new gas projects in the northern part of the North Sea, where the most recent development, Tyra Southeast, delivered first gas in 2015 and is producing above expectations."

"The redeveloped Tyra is expected to deliver approximately 60.000 barrels of oil equivalent per day at peak, and it is estimated that the redevelopment can enable the production of more than 200 million barrels of oil equivalent. Approximately 2/3 of the production is expected to be gas and 1/3 to be oil."

The redevelopment has received government approval and will commence in 2019 with the field being shut-in between November 2019 and Summer 2022 for the works to take place.

Read More

Kraken emerges

In mythology, the Kraken was a giant sea monster that dwelled in the present day North Sea. Today, the Kraken field is emerging with production growing day-by-day and a target to reach 50mbopd in H1 2018.

Gross production reached 23mbopd in November (month average) and the second processing train was brought online at the end of the month. The final DC2 production well is now onstream and the DC3 wells are near completion and expected to be brought onstream ahead of schedule. DC4 drilling will commence in 2018 and once online, will bring the field production to 50mbbl/d.
Kraken breathes some new life in the UK North Sea, being one of the small number of sizeable developments in the basin for a number of years. Its start-up has been relatively smooth, with first oil achieved at the end of June 2017 and a steady ramp-up since. Despite some above surface teething issues, these appear largely resolved with the crews getting more familiar with the FPSO operation and continued tuning of equipment.

Source: OGInsights analysis

The field is important for both EnQuest (70.5% operator) and Cairn (29.5%). With the achievement of plateau production, it is expected that one or both partners will farm-down their stake, not least having inherited additional interests from former partner First Oil when it went into administration. The long-life nature of the field, albeit heavy oil, should attract interest from major North Sea players.

Read More

Catcher if you can

The Catcher FPSO has arrived on schedule into the North Sea. The vessel is currently at Nigg performing crew changes and resupply ahead of moving to the Catcher field location.

The field remains on track to come onstream by the end of the year. Tweleve wells have been completed ahead of first oil and drilling has been better than expected, encountering 30% more net pay with 40% better well deliverability. As a result, expected plateau production has increased by 20% to 60mboepd. There is potential for a reserves upgrades above the existing 96mmboe 2P. The well results also reduce the total wells required from 20 to 18.

Read More

Sail-away to Catcher

The Catcher FPSO sailed away on 26th August from Singapore. It will take around 45 days to reach the UK North Sea, following which it will be connected and commissioned, a process expected to take 60-65 days with first oil targeting December.

The project is on schedule and c.30% below budget. Development drilling results have been promising with 30% more net pay and 40% better well deliverability. Expected plateau will now increase by 20% to 60mboepd with a potential for reserves upgrade from the 96mboe 2P at sanction.
The Catcher field partners are: Premier 50% operator, Cairn Energy 20%, MOL 20% and Dyas 10%.

Read More

Centrica and Bayerngas combine forces

On 17^th July 2017, Centrica and SWM/Bayerngas announced that they had reached agreement to combine their E&P businesses. The respective E&P businesses will be vended into a newly incorporated JV with Centrica holding 69% and SWM holding the remainder 31% in the JV. Key assets in the combined business include Kvitebjorn, Stratfjord and Ivar Assen in Norway, Cygnus in UK and Hejre in Denmark.

Source: Centrica investor presentation

The combination will create a leading pan-European E&P with Centrica’s assets providing a strong production base and Bayerngas providing a development weighted portfolio. The JV will become one of the largest players across the North Sea and will be the biggest producer in 2017.

European E&P 2017E production rankings
Source: Centrica investor presentation

European E&P reserves rankings
Source: Centrica investor presentation

There is no consideration for the transaction, but Centrica will make a series of deferred payments totalling GBP340 million (on a post-tax basis) into the JV between 2017 and 2022; these payments are in respect of upcoming decommissioning in Centrica’s E&P portfolio.

The move signals Centrica’s and SWM’s desire of moving away from E&P to focus on their core utility businesses, in line with other European utilities in recent years, some of whom have completely exited E&P. This follows on from Centrica’s efforts of streamlining its upstream portfolio with the exit of Canada and Trinidad & Tobago earlier this year and SWM’s search for a buyer of its Bayerngas business.

Centrica was known to be in discussions with ENGIE E&P on a potential combination, however following the latter’s sale to Neptune, Centrica turned its efforts to other partners which likely included other “loose” North Sea portfolios such as Dong (now sold to Ineos) and Maersk Oil as well as consolidator Ineos. Bayerngas has also spent the last couple of years searching for a public E&P merger partner, but a lack of success in finding a suitable candidate eventually led to consideration of Centrica.

The rationale for this deal centers on the positioning of the combined business for an exit. In their standalone forms, the Centrica portfolio was likely to be too large to find a private equity buyer with the two large North Sea vehicles having done their deals (i.e. Chrysaor and Neptune) and with the Bayerngas portfolio having too much development to be attractive.

The combined business is now more balanced and is of a size that one day will appeal to private equity when more money is available in this space. Alternatively, an IPO is another exit option but will have to wait until the equity markets show signs of being open again to the oil & gas sector. Nevertheless the combined portfolio in its current form, whilst sizeable and sustainable for years to come, lacks a growth story needed to entice a buyer, whether that is private equity or the public markets.

The creation of an E&P focussed business through this JV should allow it to pursue a strategy independent of its utility owners, and this includes implementing investment and the portfolio rationalisation necessary to steer the business to an exit in the mid to longer term.

Read More

What E&Ps do best: EnQuest acquires North Sea assets from BP for USD85 million

EnQuest has agreed to acquire a package of assets from BP, which includes a 25% operated interest in the Magnus field and various infrastructure interests, adding 15.9mmboe of 2P reserves and 4.2mboepd or production. EnQuest will consolidate its infrastructure interests by acquiring 3% in the Sullom Voe Terminal (currently hold 3%), 9% of the Northern Leg Gas Pipeline (currently hold 5.9%) and 3.8% of the Ninian Pipeline System (currently hold 2.7%).

The transaction makes use of an innovative financing structure in which EnQuest will not have to front any cash for the acquisition. The USD85 million consideration will be funded by deferred consideration payable from the production cash flow of the assets acquired. BP will retain the decommissioning liability in respect of the existing wells and infrastructure on the assets acquired – in exchange, EnQuest will pay 7.5% of BP’s decommissioning cost on the working interest on a post-tax basis.

As part of the deal, EnQuest also has the option to receive USD50 million from BP for undertaking the management of the decommissioning on the Thistle and Deveron fields. EnQuest currently owns 99% of these fields, with BP owning the remaining 1%. BP (and ConocoPhillips) currently retain the decommissioning liability on these fields due to a series of historical transactions, but EnQuest has the opportunity to benefit if it can manage the decommissioning more efficiently and effectively.

EnQuest has the opportunity to upsize in the assets with an option to acquire the remaining 75% of Magnus (from BP) and BP's interest in the associated infrastructure for USD300 million (subject to working capital and other adjsutments). The option is exercisable between 1 July 2018 and 15 January 2019, with EnQuest’s upfront payment limited to USD100 million and the remainder funded by a vendor loan from BP.

This transaction is aligned with EnQuest's reputation for creating value from late life assets with remaining resource potential. Magnus forms part of EnQuest’s hub around the Sullom Voe Terminal and EnQuest has the ability to maximise the potential of the field given its experience in the area and without the overheads of a majors. The relatively late life and small size of Magnus in BP’s global portfolio would have meant it received less attention and ability to obtain capital for investment would have been constrained. EnQuest has already identified synergies on Magnus with its existing assets and opportunities to operate the asset more efficiently.

Magnus overview
Source: EnQuest acquisition presentation

Magnus operational bench-marking
Source: EnQuest acquisition presentation

Read More

Siccar Point is building up its business

OGInsights recently caught up with the Siccar Point team following its successful acquisition of the OMV North Sea business, which includes an 11.8% stake in the flagship Schiehallion oil field. Together with the acquisition of a stake in the Mariner field earlier this year, Siccar Point has now built up a North Sea business of relevant scale.

Siccar Point is a North Sea focussed E&P, with financial backing from Blackstone, Blue Water Energy and GIC. It was set up in 2014 and after extensive screening of the North Sea over the past two years, the team are pleased to have finally closed a couple of transactions – the team have looked at over 50 potentially acquisitions including, not surprisingly, the ConocoPhillips and Shell North Sea assets.

The minority, non-operated stake (8.9%) in Mariner was acquired from JX Nippon with expectations of first oil in 2018. However, it was clear that this was only a first step to building a bigger North Sea business, which a small stake in a single asset is not. In that regard, the OMV package came along at an opportune time.

Having looked at the Shell North Sea assets, Siccar Point and its owners/financiers believed it was best to pass on the opportunity. As well as being a large portfolio for someone the size of Siccar Point, the substantial number of gas assets and attempt to package in the stranded Corrib asset offshore Ireland, made it strategically less attractive. The decommissioning liability that would come along with the Shell portfolio was also challenging. The OMV portfolio, which came with a smaller number of long life assets was therefore much more desirable.

The financing of North Sea assets has been an ongoing challenge for vehicles such as Siccar Point which are backed by private equity money. The business model requires for acquisitions to be financed with substantial amounts of debt, and in most cases, the amount of debt that can be raised is based on the amount of reserves. However, the UK has a regulatory regime which requires operators to provide financial guarantees (generally in the form of letters of credit) for decommissioning liabilities – these are now coming to the forefront of attention given the maturity of the North Sea and imminent or near-term cessation of production across the basin. These guarantees consume much of the debt capacity and therefore require larger cash or “equity cheques” to be fronted by acquirers. Ultimately the OMV North Sea portfolio was one that worked well for Siccar Point in terms of size and ability to finance.

Read More

Apache divesting international assets? A hard one!

On 31 July 2014, Apache announced its Q2 2014 results

• Apache said it was looking to exit its Canadian LNG positions and was considering options around its international assets
• This comes amidst Jana Partners, a hedge fund which recently picked up c.USD1bn of shares in Apache, wrote to investors arguing that Apache should focus its efforts on the North American onshore
• Reasoning behind this is that over the last few years, a number of North American onshore pure plays have outperformed Apache
• Apache's international assets, it is argued, are diluting its North American onshore story
• However, analysts do not necessarily agree
• Apache's international assets, especially those in Egypt and the North Sea, generate significant free cash flow for the group
• These are areas of existing production and are low risk operations
• The cash flows are important for the funding of the North American portfolio
• It is further noted that given the number of North Sea assets on the market, the geopolitic issues plaguing North Africa and the relative maturity (though strong cash flow generation) of these assets, it is unlikely that Apache will fund a buyer willing to pay full value
• Its other main operations are in Australia, including the Wheatstone LNG project

Read More

The state of the UK North Sea

• Tax incentives have encouraged capex spend
• ...but this has led to an overheated OFS market
• and rising costs have caused some marginal projects to be postponed or even cancelled (Bressay (Statoil) and Rosebank (Chevron) being well known examples)
• Production decline continued in 2013...
• Increase in planned and unplanned shutdowns
• Ageing infrastructure
• ...compounded by few large field start-ups and poor exploration success
• WM estimates UKNS average discovery size in 2013 to be c.11.3mmbbl, which struggle to meet commercial thresholds in current high cost environment
• Most discoveries have been tie-back opportunities
• This concerning state of UKNS will impact OFS providers; UKNS represents c.20% of global offshore spend
• Poor exploration results in recent years will lead to lower levels of future project development
• Laggan and Tormore start-up in 2014 - accounted for significant portion of UKNS capex previously
• Current backlog will support 2014/15, but backlog growth looks challenging
• Focus of oil companies has shifted to completing existing projects
• Brownfield may be a bright spot for UKNS OFS
• Drivers: increasing recovery, maintaining ever ageing infrastructure, expansion of platforms to accommodate tie-backs
• Seismic may or may not be a growth area
• Poor exploration results may lead to greater spend on seismic, but the UKNS unlikely to be seen as region with further significant potential
• With the industry in a state of strict capital discipline, cash is likely to be spent on regions where exploration is seen as more prolific
• Declining M&A reflects the downside risk perceived by buyers of the UKNS

Read More